SE_10
RAM folio 11

SE_14
RAM folio 13

SE_19
RAM folio 17

SE_50
RAM folio 42v


SE_60
RAM folio 48v

SE_63
RAM folio 51

SE_179


SE_219
RAM folio 87 (?)

SE_228

SE_230

SE_160
RAM folio 94v (?)

SE_187

SE_234
RAM folio 114v

SE_260
RAM folio 135v
SE_293
RAM folio 165

SE_333
RAM folio 186v

SE_355
RAM folio 199v

SE_369
RAM folio 210

SE_379
RAM folio 217

SE_424
RAM folio 241v

SE_483
RAM folio 273v

SE_493
RAM folio 280

SE_523
RAM folio 298v

SE_579
RAM folio 332v

SE_591
RAM folio 339v

Moʿin Moṣavver Manuscripts | History of Shah Esmāʿil | tāriḵ-e ʿālām-ārā-ye šāh esmāʿil
Manuscript M


A semi-dispersed copy of what is probably an ʿālām-ārā-ye šāh esmāʿil, illustrating events during the reign of Shah Esmāʿil, with a preamble on his progenitors.

Location:
353 bound folios containing 21 paintings are presently in the Reza Abbasi Museum, Tehran, having apparently been transferred there after the revolution from the Negarestan Museum where it was previously housed as collection no. 77.1.7. Prior to that it was in the Mahboubian Collection in New York.
Seven detached leaves most probably from the same manuscript are currently known: one is in the Harvard Art Museum, four are in a private collection, and two others whose current whereabouts are unknown.

Text and page sizes are not availble for all of the pages, but those that are corroborate that all pages are of comparable measurements. Although the existing evidence is not totally conclusive, each new piece of evidence suggests more and more that all were part of one manuscript. The "re-assembled" manuscript to date includes 28 paintings, including one (f.332v) inscribed in Moʿin’s handwriting, but that part of the inscription that might have included his signature has been smudged, and is now illegible. A later attribution next to it claims the painting to be the work of Moʿin Moṣavver. The 27 other paintings, although unsigned, are equally in the style of Moʿin, and can be attributed to him, albeit perhaps with workshop assistance.

For a detailed discussion of the evidence supporting the attribution of the loose pages to the bound Tehran volume see ms.M - Problematic aspects

In order to most closely re-create the sequence of the paintings that were in the manuscript originally, both the loose folios and the bound segment have been organized here in sequential date order of the event in accordance with the ʿālām-ārā-ye šāh esmāʿil. This is the SE number, and refers to the page number in Muntaẓer-Ṣāḥeb_1970. The paintings from the bound portion in Reza Abbasi Museum also have the folio number.

Folio size: 35.6 x 21.6 cm. (from Mahboubian Catalog)
Written surface: 21.3 (scaled) x 13.1 cm;
Text is written in good nastāʿliq, without columns, 15 lines to the page.
Dating:
The text of the ʿālām-ārā-ye šāh esmāʿil contains anachronisms referring to mid 17th century events, indicating that it was compiled, not at the end of Shah Esmāʿil's reign as implied, but rather in 1087/1676-77 (Morton, Pembroke_1990, p.188). The author has not been identified. The inscription on folio 332v contains a date, the middle of RabiʿI in the year 1010/September 1601. The date in the inscription is 1010/1601 is stylistically impossible, but the year is written 10 10, with a definite space between the first 0 and the second 1, suggesting that the date might been damaged or altered. If the second 1 was originally something else, it could only be a 6 or 9, making it either 1060/1650 or 1090/1679. The middle of RabiʿI in the year 1090/June 1679 fits chronologically and stylistically well with the other Esmāʿil histories, as well as conforming to Morton's projected date for the compilation of the tāriḵ-e ʿālām-ārā-ye šāh esmāʿil.


Bibliography:
Muntaẓer-Ṣāḥeb_1970.
Mahboubian_1972, no. 923.
Morton, Pembroke_1990, p.188.

Robert Eng
Last Updated: August 10, 2013 |
Originally published: Mar. 28, 2002 | Revised: Nov. 30, 2010
| Revised: Apr. 19, 2012




SE_67

SE_75

SE_140